Warning: due to the subject matter, this is going to be a long post.
Firstly I must state that I am not a qualified lawyer although I have studied and sat (and passed!) a paper on contract law as part of my accountancy studies. It does not make me an expert so my disclaimer follows.
Disclaimer: My opinions here are my opinions only and in no way should anyone take the contents of this post as legal advice.
If there are any law practitioners reading this post, I will be happy to hear you point out any errors I made.
Your rights as a chess participant
How many times you have participated in tournaments where the organizer/arbiter act like God? They are like judges in a courtroom, their powers are not to be questioned. Their attitude is "my tournament, my rules".
Chess players are always an aggrieved and powerless lot. They are always at the mercy of organizers/arbiters/officials actions and rulings. Some these rulings even seem arbitrary. Yet chess players do not have any recourse against such actions.
Maybe some of you might not even know you have any rights until now. Here I want to give everyone some food for thought about your rights. I am going to discuss about chess organizers and whether their actions are legal under the Law of Contracts.
Before we start, we need a basic understanding of the Law of Contracts.
Invitation to Treat
We must distinguish between a contract and an "invitation to treat". An invitation to treat is an expression of willingness to negotiate a contract. It is an offer that is non binding.
A good example is the display of goods in a shop window. The shop owner is inviting you into his shop. You see the goods on display, maybe you feel like buying something. You walk into the shop. The shop owner does not like your face and refuses to sell you anything. Does he have this right? If you open a shop, can you refuse to sell your goods?
The answer is YES, because there is no contract yet. The display is an invitation. You go in and OFFER to pay for the goods at the amount advertised. The shop owner ACCEPTS your offer and the transaction is completed. Most people will be thinking it is the other way round but it is not - at least this is what I learnt, any legal practitional is most welcome to correct me here.
Other examples are the advertisement of a price, invitation for tenders or auction, invitation to apply for shares etc. Usually these invitations will come with some terms attached for example, subject to stock availability, and in tenders a disclaimer that the right not to accept any tender. In the case of an auction there may be a reserve price and if the highest bid does not meet this price, then the auctioneer need not sell.
Contracts
A contract is a binding agreement between two or more parties. There must be an offer and an acceptance and a mutual understanding (meeting of the minds) of the terms of the contract.
You offer and I accept to buy a car from you at the price of one thousand dollars - a contract is formed. On delivery, I found that the car is actually two half-cuts joined together (side note: this does happen in Malaysia, so be carefully if you are buying a second-hand car!). I can dispute and demand my money back, if necessary by going to court - a sane man expects to buy a whole car, therefore there is no meeting of minds.
Consideration
There must be something of value to each party. This can be monetary or something of value. It does not matter if the perceived value is not the real value. You sell me your car for one thousand dollars. Later I found that the market value is only five hundred. The contract is still valid. This is caveat emptor or "let the buyer beware"
Proton Holdings Bhd (Malaysian car manufacturer) famously sold MV Augusta (a motorcycle maker, which they originally bought for 70 million Euro) for one euro. The Malaysian public is incensed. Why one Euro? Might as well give it away , right?
The answer is that they could not give it away for nothing (no consideration). They have to sell it for one Euro, otherwise the contract could be considered non binding. This is known as nominal consideration.
Consideration is not necessary monetary. You go to a car wash, pay money and get back a clean car. The clean car is your consideration.
Delivery and Performance
You agree to sell and I agree to buy your car for one thousand dollars (a contract is made). You drive the car to my house and hand over the keys to me (delivery). I pay you one thousand dollars (performance). If I do not pay you, I am in breach of contract.
Legality of contract
I pay you one thousand dollars to kill X. You take the money but do not perform your part. I take you to court for not living up to your end of the contract. The judge throws out the case as this contract is not enforceable by law since it involves murder which is an illegal act. Not only did I lose the case, the police are waiting outside to take me into custody.
You promise your girlfriend you will marry her. Based on this, the two of you consumate the deal (think what you want). Months later, you still refuse to marry her. She sues you for breach of contract for one million dollars. Lesson learn: contracts can be oral.
What's chess got to do with it?
The first question is whether a chess tournament, the participants and the organizers are entering into a valid contract. Let me put forward a few scenarios
Scenario 1
Someone advertises to hold a chess tournament, Entry fee is twenty-five ringgit, there are three prizes five , three and two hundred. The tournament is open to all those without a FIDE rating.
By advertising the tournament whether on a website or by email or other means, the organizer is making an offer to treat. If a player shows up at the tournament with the intention to take part, this is an intention to accept the offer. The entry fees and the prize money are the considerations to this contract.
If I were to show up and try to enter the tournament, the organizer can refuse to accept my entry. This is because the advertisement is an offer to treat , not a contract yet.
But suppose the organizer accepts my entry by taking my twenty ringgit and puts my name in the list of participants. This forms a valid contract between the tournament organizer and me. I am paired every round and I even win the tournament half a point ahead of the nearest participant.
At the prize giving, I am not named the winner. The organizer claimed that I have a FIDE rating and the tournament rules specifically excludes me from partipating. Instead the first prize is given to someone
else.
I have paid the entry (consideration). I have completed the tournament ahead of everyone (performance). The organizer did not award the first prize to me (non performance). This is breach of contract and if I were to take this case to a court of law, I believe I have excellent chances of winning.
Scenario 2
Someone advertises to hold a chess tournament, Entry fee is twenty-five ringgit, there are three prizes five , three and two hundred.
I show up at the tournament venue at the said time. I'm the only one there, organizers say the touranment is cancelled and goes home.
Scenario 3
Someone advertises to hold a chess tournament, Entry fee is twenty-five ringgit, there are three prizes five , three and two hundred.
I show up at the tournament venue at the said time. The number of players is only ten (organizer will lose money since the entry fee cannot support the prize fund advertised). Organizers revise the prize to one hundred, fifty and thirty ringgit.
For both scenario 2 and 3, the organizers have this right. Now, most of you might disagree with me. The commonest argument will be that the organizers cannot simply cancel or change the prize fund at their whim.
There cannot be a contract between the organizer and player in both scenarios because there has been no consideration until the organizer accepts the player's entry fees. As long as the organizer have not accepted any fees, they have the right to change the conditions, even to the extent of cancelling the tournament altogether.
However, if entry fees are accepted then the person who have paid the fees (and the organizers accepted it) have the right to object to any changes.
Scenario 4
Someone advertises to hold a chess tournament, Entry fee is twenty-five ringgit, there are three prizes five , three and two hundred. The tournament is six rounds on Sunday , 4th April 2010.
I send in my entry with twenty-five ringgit entry fees. On 29th March 2010, the organizer announces that the tournament has been postponed to 11th April 2010. I happen to be out of town on that day. I insist that the tournament be held on 4th April. The organizer does not comply and I take the case to court.
Scenario 5
Someone advertises to hold a chess tournament, Entry fee is twenty-five ringgit, there are three prizes five , three and two hundred. The tournament is six rounds on Sunday , 4th April 2010.
I send in my entry with twenty-five ringgit entry fees. On the day of the tournament over a hundred players turn up. The organizer changes the number of rounds to nine to accomodate the large number of participants. I think my chances are better with a six round tournament and I protest against the change.
For both scenario 4 and 5, I am within my rights. After the contract has been made between the organizer and me, the terms cannot be changed without my agreement. This relates to the prize fund, tournament schedule, number of rounds, entry fees and anything else that has been advertised beforehand.
Scenario 6
Scenario six is not a scenario but a really happened. In late 1980's , Peter Long showed up at a tournament organized by Latiff who refused him entry. Peter demanded a reason, eventually Latiff told him that there was a ban on him (Peter).
The kicker of this story. Peter wanted to know why he was not informed of the ban and Latiff replied that is was a "secret ban". I found that so funny because "secret ban" should be added to this list of oxymorons
Unfortunately, it is true that anyone can be denied entry at the organizer's discretion, just like the shop owner example I gave above.
The End
If you protest too much, most organizers think that they can just refund your entry fees and that is the end of the matter. In actual fact, you do not have to accept it but most of us will because it is not worth the trouble to pursue.
On an ending note, I just want to point out that we do not need to go to court for such small matters. In Malaysia (and most countries), there is a Consumer or Small Claims Tribunal. You do not even need a lawyer. For a small fee ( I think fifteen ringgit or thereabouts) you can bring your claim to the tribunal for hearing. This advice is only if you got cheated on purchases etc, not for claims against chess organizers!
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Another new Malaysian chess blog
This morning I saw another new chess blog which just started yesterday. I read the first post and already hooked. There is an air of mystery about our new blogger. He does not identify himself but gives some clues - around since the early 90s, represented Malaysia several times, still plays competitively today - aarrgh I still cannot figure out who he/she is!. More clues, more clues!
This blogger has confidence in him/herself - "my opinions are based on my experience and skill in chess, of which I know have much more than the average blogger" -, has a nice little niche for his blog - my opinion the crap that people throw around in the Malaysian chess scene today, tomorrow, the day after and so on.
I think he read my 7 reasons why you should not start a chess blog and decided all those reasons did not apply to him/her :) All in all a very promising new blog!
His blog is here
This blogger has confidence in him/herself - "my opinions are based on my experience and skill in chess, of which I know have much more than the average blogger" -, has a nice little niche for his blog - my opinion the crap that people throw around in the Malaysian chess scene today, tomorrow, the day after and so on.
I think he read my 7 reasons why you should not start a chess blog and decided all those reasons did not apply to him/her :) All in all a very promising new blog!
His blog is here
Friday, March 26, 2010
Norazman pleads his side of the story
I found this letter on Ng6 blog. I too do not take any side but I believe everyone has a right to his side of the story.
With this in mind, I publish the letter which Norazman sent to Ng6 and published on Ng6 blog.
From:
To:
Zali302@yahoo.com
Saya terpanggil untuk menulis cerita sebenar tentang peristiwa yang berlaku di Kejohanan Catur di Titiwangsa. Kejadian yang telah diperbesarkan itu berlaku disebabkan niat seseorang yang menyimpan dendam peribadi.
Setelah lama menyepi dari pertandingan catur, saya telah bermain di kejohanan kelolaan seorang sahabat Mr. Collin Madhavan di Cheras. Di sana, saya telah menjadi juara. Disebabkan kerinduan kepada catur, saya pun mencari di Internet kejohanan pada hujung minggu itu(Ahad,21hb Mac 2010).
Saya terlihat ada dua kejohanan di Kuala Lumpur iaitu Stonemaster dan di Titiwangsa. Di Stonemaster, saya tahu hanya untuk rating 1600 ke bawah. Maka, saya hanya menghantar 2 orang anak saya menyertai kejohanan tersebut. Saya tidak sedari di Titiwangsa pertandingan tersebut juga hanya untuk rating 1600 ke bawah.
Saya telah kenal En.Latiff semenjak 1998, iaitu 12 tahun lepas semasa beliau mengendalikan kejohanan di Universiti Malaya(UM).
Sejak itu, persahabatan kami semakin rapat sehingga beliau selalu datang ke Chow Kit bersama sahabat catur yang lain iaitu Azahari Md. Noh dan Ghazali Che Kob. Kami selalu bermain Blitz di sana bersama rakan-rakan lain.
Kira-kira 6-7 tahun yang lepas, beliau telah meminta saya dan rakan saya membuat kerja wiring elektrik di rumah beliau di Taman Melawati. Semuanya berjalan lancar sehingga di tahap akhir, kerja wiring tersebut kami ada berbalah pasal harga yang beliau pinta.Semasa pertemuan saya dengan Rizal A. Kamal di pusingan ke-4 kejohanan di Titiwangsa,kami di meja pertama. Di luar dugaan saya, jam yang dibekalkan dimeja tersebut tidak berfungsi dengan baik. Saya telah mengunci jam tersebut sebanyak 2 kali kerana ianya tidak bergerak. Pada kali ke-3 saya mengunci jam tersebut, seorang budak lelaki India berumur sekitar 11-12 tahun, tiba-tiba berkata "tadi masa ada 10 minit". Tapi jamnya tertera sekitar 6 minit lebih.
Saya terkejut mendengar dakwaan budak India tersebut dan saya kata "mana ada" kerana saya hanya mengunci jam tersebut dan tidak menyentuh masa. Pada masa itu, Rizal melihat masa pada jam tersebut dan tidak komen apa-apa pun. Sebelum itu pun, saya ada mengunci jam tersebut dan tidak berlaku apa-apa. Sekiranya benar dakwaan budak lelaki India tersebut, Rizal sudah terlebih dahulu membuat bantahan dan menghentikan permainan tetapi, itu tidak berlaku. Beliau bukan sahaja tidak melihat sebarang perubahan masa tetapi yakin tiada berlaku sebarang penipuan.
Dia meneruskan permainan seperti biasa dan akhirnya saya telah berjaya mendapat posisi checkmate, lalu beliau pun resign. Setelah kalah dalam permainan tersebut, barulah dia hendak mendisqualifiedkan saya dengan berbagai cara antaranya membesarkan kembali dakwaan budak lelaki India tersebut. Cuba kita ambil sebiji jam catur dan lihat dari sisi tepi masanya, kemudian lihat dari hadapan. Sudah tentu akan terlihat perbezaan masanya. Seandainya saya hendak mengubah masa jam tersebut, ianya bukan 6 minit sepatutnya 1 minit barulah saya boleh menang masa. Di mana akal kita yang sihat boleh mengatakan perkara tersebut boleh berlaku dan Rizal memang sedar tentang perkara tersebut.
Ianya hanya dibangkitkan untuk memenangi kejohanan tersebut dan semata-mata kerana RM 500 beliau tergamak memburukkan orang lain. Di manakah etika seorang pemain catur yang budiman? Dunia catur kita kecil sahaja, satu masa nanti orang akan tahu siapa betul dan siapa salah. Rizal, jujurlah dengan diri sendiri adakah anda benar ada melihat sendiri masa telah dikurangkan? Janganlah hanya kerana dakwaan seorang budak lelaki India, hukuman dijatuhkan pada seseorang. Andai begitu kejadiannya memang sungguh senang hendak memburukkan seseorang dan apa akan jadi kepada dunia catur kita?
Kepada En. Latiff sebelum permainan bermula, saya telah menyemak rating saya dengan seorang rakan, Chong Kwai Kun(pemenang ke-4) dan rating nasional saya ialah 1684. Saya telah bertemu dengan En.Latiff dan telah bertanya sebayak 2 kali kepada beliau "bolehkah saya bermain", dan beliau kata "mainlah dulu" kemudian nama saya pun disenaraikan. Tidak masuk akal beliau tidak kenal saya dan tidak tahu rating saya.
Setelah semua perlawanan selesai dan pada majlis penyampaian hadiah nama saya telah dikeluarkan dari senarai pemenang. Saya bertanya kepada beliau mengapa dan apa sebabnya? Beliau berkata rating saya lebih dari 1800. Itu hanya rating fide saya. Kemudian wang entry fee saya pun dikembalikan. Bukankah lebih mudah saya tidak disenaraikan dari mula.
Saya kemudian sedar, perkara tersebut telah beliau rancangkan sedari awal. Kes jam dan rating tersebut hanyalah alasan beliau untuk mengenakan saya kembali dengan cara yang licik. Kepada En.Latiff janganlah hal peribadi mempengaruhi keputusan profesional kita. Kepada Rizal, janganlah hendak menghalalkan RM 500 itu hanya dengan dakwaan seorang budak lelaki India. Sekiranya perkara tersebut dibiarkan berterusan sungguh malanglah masa depan catur kita. Sesiapa sahaja boleh menjadi mangsa seterusnya.
Labels:
Norazman
Thursday, March 25, 2010
Naming names
A certain player was accused of cheating by manipulating the clock (according to the report a bystander saw that the clock times were changed). This player subsequently won the tournament. However he was disqualified - not for cheating - for playing in the tournament when his FIDE rating was above the maximum allowed. The player who accused him was awarded the top prize instead.
However, some people started commenting in various shoutboxes and the accused name came up. His name is now well known and now everyone is calling him a cheat. I have no knowledge of the truth of the claims but this man will forever be branded a cheater. I kind of have a problem with this. It is like presuming guilt without a trial, since the arbiter never tried to verify the accuser's claim (fairly easy by adding up the clock times factoring in any increments).
This is a dangerous trend - using shoutbox to accuse or smear a person's reputation. I am still considering whether to remove my own shoutbox. It will be a pity to do so, because it is still the best way to get feedback from readers.
However, some people started commenting in various shoutboxes and the accused name came up. His name is now well known and now everyone is calling him a cheat. I have no knowledge of the truth of the claims but this man will forever be branded a cheater. I kind of have a problem with this. It is like presuming guilt without a trial, since the arbiter never tried to verify the accuser's claim (fairly easy by adding up the clock times factoring in any increments).
This is a dangerous trend - using shoutbox to accuse or smear a person's reputation. I am still considering whether to remove my own shoutbox. It will be a pity to do so, because it is still the best way to get feedback from readers.
GM Gerhard Schebler
Pic - Gerhard Schebler
Schebler is married to a Thai national and has recently choosen to settle down at the seaside resort town of Pattaya, Thailand. True to his passion, he founded a chess club there and is looking forward to help to develop chess in the region and to take care of the chess tourists.
With 20 years experience of coaching, Schebler is willing to impart his experience and expertise. He will be available for single/group lessons of any strength up to 2350 Elo. Lessons can be given in Malaysia or Pattaya (which is an entertaining place).
Other services he plans to provide are online lessons on the ICC chess server and as a tournament guide for any kind of championships and also for various kind of simuls.
He can be contacted by email (caissas_erbe@yahoo.de) and beginning of May by phone - 0066 (0)81 1595341
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Sportsmanship and Cheating
Recently there is a case of cheating being reported by various blogs. You can read the full story here.
I just want to say that such accusations are almost impossible to prove. Everyone have a story of how they were cheated. Just to give my example, over twenty years ago this happened to me. I was up against a player who has been around for a long time. At that time I was a very fast player and after each move I usually get up to look at other games around me. Upon returning to the board, I sat down and saw my opponent had not made his move yet. After a while, I glanced at the clock and realized my time was running! My opponent flatly denied starting my clock. There was not much I could do except my renewed determination to beat him properly over the board. I do not want to name the player because there is just no proof. For example, I could have made my move without pressing my clock - happens to a lot of players.
Then there is another blogger who claimed he was cheated. There was a three-fold repetition and he made his move, stopped the clock to call the arbiter. Thereupon, his opponent made his move and the three-fold repetition no longer exists.
Hello, this is not cheating. Resetting the clock to give yourself more time or to lessen your opponent time is cheating. Starting your opponent clock without making your move is cheating. Using computer software to help you during a tournament game is cheating.
Making your move after your opponent makes his - even if he stopped the clock - is not cheating. By the way, even if your opponent did not make any move, the arbiter will not award you three-fold repetition. The simple reason is that you only have the right to claim when it is your move. Once you played your move on the board - with or without pressing the clock - the move already passed to your opponent.
Our blogger goes on to say "A sporting and gentleman player would have accept the draw". Yeah, right. By the same logic, if we have a lost position we should resign? Got to tell that to all my opponents. Especially the one who took advantage when I left my rook en prise.
I just want to say that such accusations are almost impossible to prove. Everyone have a story of how they were cheated. Just to give my example, over twenty years ago this happened to me. I was up against a player who has been around for a long time. At that time I was a very fast player and after each move I usually get up to look at other games around me. Upon returning to the board, I sat down and saw my opponent had not made his move yet. After a while, I glanced at the clock and realized my time was running! My opponent flatly denied starting my clock. There was not much I could do except my renewed determination to beat him properly over the board. I do not want to name the player because there is just no proof. For example, I could have made my move without pressing my clock - happens to a lot of players.
Then there is another blogger who claimed he was cheated. There was a three-fold repetition and he made his move, stopped the clock to call the arbiter. Thereupon, his opponent made his move and the three-fold repetition no longer exists.
Hello, this is not cheating. Resetting the clock to give yourself more time or to lessen your opponent time is cheating. Starting your opponent clock without making your move is cheating. Using computer software to help you during a tournament game is cheating.
Making your move after your opponent makes his - even if he stopped the clock - is not cheating. By the way, even if your opponent did not make any move, the arbiter will not award you three-fold repetition. The simple reason is that you only have the right to claim when it is your move. Once you played your move on the board - with or without pressing the clock - the move already passed to your opponent.
Our blogger goes on to say "A sporting and gentleman player would have accept the draw". Yeah, right. By the same logic, if we have a lost position we should resign? Got to tell that to all my opponents. Especially the one who took advantage when I left my rook en prise.
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
My Blog List
I'm quite selective of the blogs that I add to my list. I only add those I enjoy reading and will visit almost daily.
Today just added Ilhamuddin http://2010chessodyssey.blogspot.com/blog to my list of blogs. Even though he just started recently, I find he has some cool and imaginative posts.
DATCC blog has undergone totally different design change. I'm not sure I like it though. It is kind of hard to read and find stuff. I hope Andrew will improve it.
Today just added Ilhamuddin http://2010chessodyssey.blogspot.com/blog to my list of blogs. Even though he just started recently, I find he has some cool and imaginative posts.
DATCC blog has undergone totally different design change. I'm not sure I like it though. It is kind of hard to read and find stuff. I hope Andrew will improve it.
Monday, March 22, 2010
Malays only tournament poll
Gilacatur set up a poll to vote hereon whether readers support such a racial based chess tournament. "Adakah anda sokong diadakan 'Kejohanan Catur Tertutup Melayu' oleh Kelab Catur Jaffolea pada bulan Jun nanti" (translation: "Do you support the Malay Closed Chess Championship by Jaffolea Chess Club this coming June")
I put in my votes and got the results so far. Out of 59 votes, 4 is "dont care" (tidak kisah/tidak peduli). The majority is against it but to my surprise there is 36% voting for Yes (Ya).
Maybe this is ala the NEP (National Economic Policy) rationale, we need NEP because the Malays are unable to compete against other races. I feel like throwing up now, so I'll just stop writing here.
Friday, March 19, 2010
Jack Daniels Chess Set
This really tickles me pink. There is a chess set available on Amazon for a paltry $159. It's called a Jack Daniels chess set.
I'll like to have one made with hollow pieces and pawns. Now you can fill each one with your favourite drink (scotch, whisky, bourbon?) and start playing. When someone captures one of the pawns or pieces, they have to drink the contents. Sounds fun?
If you are prone to blundering pieces and pawns, then my chess set is guaranteed to even the odds.
Bottoms up!
I'll like to have one made with hollow pieces and pawns. Now you can fill each one with your favourite drink (scotch, whisky, bourbon?) and start playing. When someone captures one of the pawns or pieces, they have to drink the contents. Sounds fun?
If you are prone to blundering pieces and pawns, then my chess set is guaranteed to even the odds.
Bottoms up!
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
New chess blog
Just browsed on Ilhamudin new blog which he titled 2010 Chess Odyssey. He says it is inspired by the book and movie 2001 A Space Odyssey. I like his blog posts, they are interesting to read, unlike those who just posting tournament results.
His latest post is on one of my favourite game.
His latest post is on one of my favourite game.
Monday, March 15, 2010
Sunday, March 14, 2010
Interesting facts on the Amber tournament
- The tournament is sponsored by Joop van Oosterom. It is named after his daughter Amber Melody. Oosterom himself is a world champion in correspondence chess.
- van Oosterom is a billionaire and when you have so much money that you do not know what to do with, what better than to finance a tournament where the best players in the world will compete with each other for the best prizes and the best playing conditions ever?
- This is the 19th edition of the Amber Rapid and Blindfold Chess Tournament
- The players play two blindfold games and two rapid games. Actually they do not play blindfolded but there is computer screen with a blank chessboard where they enter their moves.
- Vladimir Kramnik has won this tournament six times either clear or shared first. When he did not win, he shared second.
- Kramnik liked blindfold so much, he actually considered asking the organizers to allow him to play the rapid games blindfold as well (!).
- Ponomariov and Gashimov had never played blindfold before. Both won their first blindfold game.
- Carlsen opened his first blindfold game with Ivanchuk with 1. a3 (he lost when he blundered a piece)
- Grischuk is well known for getting into time trouble in all his games. He managed to beat Kramnik in 43 moves in their first blindfold game, his last 25 moves were all made in time trouble!
- van Oosterom is a billionaire and when you have so much money that you do not know what to do with, what better than to finance a tournament where the best players in the world will compete with each other for the best prizes and the best playing conditions ever?
- This is the 19th edition of the Amber Rapid and Blindfold Chess Tournament
- The players play two blindfold games and two rapid games. Actually they do not play blindfolded but there is computer screen with a blank chessboard where they enter their moves.
- Vladimir Kramnik has won this tournament six times either clear or shared first. When he did not win, he shared second.
- Kramnik liked blindfold so much, he actually considered asking the organizers to allow him to play the rapid games blindfold as well (!).
- Ponomariov and Gashimov had never played blindfold before. Both won their first blindfold game.
- Carlsen opened his first blindfold game with Ivanchuk with 1. a3 (he lost when he blundered a piece)
- Grischuk is well known for getting into time trouble in all his games. He managed to beat Kramnik in 43 moves in their first blindfold game, his last 25 moves were all made in time trouble!
Saturday, March 13, 2010
The 19th Amber Blindfold and Rapid starts!
The 19th Amber Blindfold and Rapid starts today at Palais de la Mediterranée, in Nice, France.
This year's field is as strong as ever, and includes (in rating order): Magnus Carlsen (Norway), Vladimir Kramnik (Russia), Levon Aronian (Armenia), Alexander Grischuk (Russia - a late replacement for Alexander Morozevich), Peter Svidler (Russia), Boris Gelfand (Israel), Vassily Ivanchuk (Ukraine), Vugar Gashimov (Azerbaijan), Ruslan Ponomariov (Ukraine), Sergey Karjakin (Russia), Leinier Dominguez (Cuba), and Jan Smeets (The Netherlands).
If only Anand and Topalov were in this. But those two will be in deep preparations for their forthcoming World Championship match
The blindford sessions have started, refresh your browser to see latest moves
Dominguez (2713) - Gashimov (2740) [A32]
19th Amber Blindfold&Rapid *Blindfold* Nice/France (1.3), 2010
[Robot 3]
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.g3 c5 4.Nf3 cxd4 5.Nxd4 Bb4+ 6.Bd2 Be7 7.Bg2 Nc6 8.Bf4 0-0 9.Nc3 e5 10.Nxc6 bxc6 11.Bxe5 Qa5 12.Bd6 Bxd6 13.Qxd6 Ba6 14.Qd4 Rab8 15.0-0 c5 16.Qd2 Bxc4 17.Rfd1 Be6 18.b3 Rfc8 19.Nd5 Qxd2 20.Rxd2 Kf8 21.Rc1 Nxd5 22.Bxd5 Ke7 23.Rc4 Rb4 24.Rxb4 cxb4 25.Bxe6 fxe6 26.f4 d5 27.Kf2 Rc3 28.e3 Kf6 29.Kf3 h6 30.h3 a5 31.Kf2 g5 32.Kf3 Kf5 33.Kf2 g4 34.hxg4+ Kxg4 35.Re2 h5 36.Kg2 Kf5 37.Kf3 d4 38.Re1 e5 39.fxe5 Kxe5 40.Kf2 Rc2+ 41.Kf3 d3 42.Rh1 Rxa2 43.Rxh5+ Ke6 44.e4 a4 45.bxa4 b3 46.Rh1 b2 47.Rb1 d2 48.Ke2 Ra1 0-1
Ponomariov (2737) - Gelfand (2750)
19th Amber Blindfold&Rapid *Blindfold* Nice/France (1.1), 2010
[Robot 3]
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.e3 Nf6 4.Bd3 Bg4 5.Ne2 e6 6.Qb3 Qc7 7.Ng3 Nh5 8.Nc3 Nd7 9.Bd2 Nb6 10.c5 Nd7 11.e4 Nxg3 12.hxg3 dxe4 13.Nxe4 Bf5 14.Bf4 e5 15.Ng5 Nxc5 16.dxc5 Bxd3 17.0-0-0 0-0-0 18.Nxf7 Rd5 19.Rxd3 Qxf7 20.Rxd5 cxd5 21.Bxe5 Bxc5 22.f4 b6 23.Qc2 Kb7 24.Rxh7 Rg8 25.Kb1 a5 26.a3 d4 27.Qe4+ Ka7 28.Qd3 Qb7 29.Ka2 Qd5+ 30.Qb3 Rd8 31.Qxd5 Rxd5 32.Rxg7+ Ka6 33.Rh7 d3 34.Rh1 Bf2 35.g4 d2 36.Rd1 Be3 37.g3 Bf2 38.g5 Bxg3 39.g6 Rd8 40. g7 a4 41. Rxd2 1-0
Grischuk (2756) - Kramnik (2790)
19th Amber Blindfold&Rapid *Blindfold* Nice/France (1.2), 2010
[Robot 3]
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.Nc3 Bb4 5.cxd5 exd5 6.Bg5 Nbd7 7.Qc2 0-0 8.a3 Bxc3+ 9.Qxc3 h6 10.Bh4 c5 11.Nd2 c4 12.g4 b5 13.Bg2 Nb6 14.h3 Re8 15.e3 a5 16.0-0 Qd6 17.Qc2 Bd7 18.Rfe1 Rac8 19.Bg3 Qc6 20.Be5 b4 21.axb4 axb4 22.e4 c3 23.exd5 Nfxd5 24.bxc3 bxc3 25.Ne4 Qg6 26.Qb3 c2 27.Nc5 Rxe5 28.Rxe5 Nf4 29.Rc1 Bc6 30.Qxb6 Nxg2 31.Qa6 Ra8 32.Qd3 Nh4 33.Re3 Qg5 34.Ne4 Nf3+ 35.Kg2 Qf4 36.d5 Ne5 37.Qxc2 Bxd5 38.Rd1 Nxg4 39.hxg4 Qxg4+ 40.Kf1 Ra2 41. Qd3 Qh4 42. Nf6+ gxf6 43. Rg3+ 1-0
This year's field is as strong as ever, and includes (in rating order): Magnus Carlsen (Norway), Vladimir Kramnik (Russia), Levon Aronian (Armenia), Alexander Grischuk (Russia - a late replacement for Alexander Morozevich), Peter Svidler (Russia), Boris Gelfand (Israel), Vassily Ivanchuk (Ukraine), Vugar Gashimov (Azerbaijan), Ruslan Ponomariov (Ukraine), Sergey Karjakin (Russia), Leinier Dominguez (Cuba), and Jan Smeets (The Netherlands).
If only Anand and Topalov were in this. But those two will be in deep preparations for their forthcoming World Championship match
The blindford sessions have started, refresh your browser to see latest moves
Dominguez (2713) - Gashimov (2740) [A32]
19th Amber Blindfold&Rapid *Blindfold* Nice/France (1.3), 2010
[Robot 3]
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.g3 c5 4.Nf3 cxd4 5.Nxd4 Bb4+ 6.Bd2 Be7 7.Bg2 Nc6 8.Bf4 0-0 9.Nc3 e5 10.Nxc6 bxc6 11.Bxe5 Qa5 12.Bd6 Bxd6 13.Qxd6 Ba6 14.Qd4 Rab8 15.0-0 c5 16.Qd2 Bxc4 17.Rfd1 Be6 18.b3 Rfc8 19.Nd5 Qxd2 20.Rxd2 Kf8 21.Rc1 Nxd5 22.Bxd5 Ke7 23.Rc4 Rb4 24.Rxb4 cxb4 25.Bxe6 fxe6 26.f4 d5 27.Kf2 Rc3 28.e3 Kf6 29.Kf3 h6 30.h3 a5 31.Kf2 g5 32.Kf3 Kf5 33.Kf2 g4 34.hxg4+ Kxg4 35.Re2 h5 36.Kg2 Kf5 37.Kf3 d4 38.Re1 e5 39.fxe5 Kxe5 40.Kf2 Rc2+ 41.Kf3 d3 42.Rh1 Rxa2 43.Rxh5+ Ke6 44.e4 a4 45.bxa4 b3 46.Rh1 b2 47.Rb1 d2 48.Ke2 Ra1 0-1
Ponomariov (2737) - Gelfand (2750)
19th Amber Blindfold&Rapid *Blindfold* Nice/France (1.1), 2010
[Robot 3]
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.e3 Nf6 4.Bd3 Bg4 5.Ne2 e6 6.Qb3 Qc7 7.Ng3 Nh5 8.Nc3 Nd7 9.Bd2 Nb6 10.c5 Nd7 11.e4 Nxg3 12.hxg3 dxe4 13.Nxe4 Bf5 14.Bf4 e5 15.Ng5 Nxc5 16.dxc5 Bxd3 17.0-0-0 0-0-0 18.Nxf7 Rd5 19.Rxd3 Qxf7 20.Rxd5 cxd5 21.Bxe5 Bxc5 22.f4 b6 23.Qc2 Kb7 24.Rxh7 Rg8 25.Kb1 a5 26.a3 d4 27.Qe4+ Ka7 28.Qd3 Qb7 29.Ka2 Qd5+ 30.Qb3 Rd8 31.Qxd5 Rxd5 32.Rxg7+ Ka6 33.Rh7 d3 34.Rh1 Bf2 35.g4 d2 36.Rd1 Be3 37.g3 Bf2 38.g5 Bxg3 39.g6 Rd8 40. g7 a4 41. Rxd2 1-0
Grischuk (2756) - Kramnik (2790)
19th Amber Blindfold&Rapid *Blindfold* Nice/France (1.2), 2010
[Robot 3]
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.Nc3 Bb4 5.cxd5 exd5 6.Bg5 Nbd7 7.Qc2 0-0 8.a3 Bxc3+ 9.Qxc3 h6 10.Bh4 c5 11.Nd2 c4 12.g4 b5 13.Bg2 Nb6 14.h3 Re8 15.e3 a5 16.0-0 Qd6 17.Qc2 Bd7 18.Rfe1 Rac8 19.Bg3 Qc6 20.Be5 b4 21.axb4 axb4 22.e4 c3 23.exd5 Nfxd5 24.bxc3 bxc3 25.Ne4 Qg6 26.Qb3 c2 27.Nc5 Rxe5 28.Rxe5 Nf4 29.Rc1 Bc6 30.Qxb6 Nxg2 31.Qa6 Ra8 32.Qd3 Nh4 33.Re3 Qg5 34.Ne4 Nf3+ 35.Kg2 Qf4 36.d5 Ne5 37.Qxc2 Bxd5 38.Rd1 Nxg4 39.hxg4 Qxg4+ 40.Kf1 Ra2 41. Qd3 Qh4 42. Nf6+ gxf6 43. Rg3+ 1-0
Friday, March 12, 2010
MCF Selection Guidelines is out
Malaysian Chess Federation has published its guidelines for selection to all international tournaments. You can read it here These guidelines take effect from this month - March 2010.
MCF has finally formed a Selection Committee. Very good. The current committee are
Chairman - Tan Sri Ramli Bin Ngah Talib
Deputy Chairman - Hj Ibrahim A. Bakar
Secretary - Mr. Gregory Lau
Committee members - Pn. Haslindah Ruslan , En. Abd Hamid Majid, Hj Ibrahim Yaacob Committee
For team events like the Olympiad and Asian Team Championships, the top four from the mens and womens Malaysian Masters will be chosen. A fifth choice will be at the discretion of the MCF President.
The Masters tournament top four are already known.
Mens
1. Mas Hafizul
2. Mok Tze Meng
3. Lim Yee Weng
4. Nicholas Chan
Women
1. Nurul Huda
2. Nur Nabila
3. Fong Mi Yen
4. Alia Bakri
Teh committee reserves the right to exercise final discretion in the selection of players for the National Squad. In the event that one player decides to pull out from participation after selection, the SC has the final say on a replacement.
As 2010 is an olympiad year, the above will form the team to this year's event which will be held in the town of Khanty-Mansiysk in Siberia.
Selection for other individual events like the Continental Championships, Zonal Championships and Commonwealth Open Championship will be based on the highest ranked Malaysian in FIDE rating list at that time.
MCF has finally formed a Selection Committee. Very good. The current committee are
Chairman - Tan Sri Ramli Bin Ngah Talib
Deputy Chairman - Hj Ibrahim A. Bakar
Secretary - Mr. Gregory Lau
Committee members - Pn. Haslindah Ruslan , En. Abd Hamid Majid, Hj Ibrahim Yaacob Committee
For team events like the Olympiad and Asian Team Championships, the top four from the mens and womens Malaysian Masters will be chosen. A fifth choice will be at the discretion of the MCF President.
The Masters tournament top four are already known.
Mens
1. Mas Hafizul
2. Mok Tze Meng
3. Lim Yee Weng
4. Nicholas Chan
Women
1. Nurul Huda
2. Nur Nabila
3. Fong Mi Yen
4. Alia Bakri
Teh committee reserves the right to exercise final discretion in the selection of players for the National Squad. In the event that one player decides to pull out from participation after selection, the SC has the final say on a replacement.
As 2010 is an olympiad year, the above will form the team to this year's event which will be held in the town of Khanty-Mansiysk in Siberia.
Selection for other individual events like the Continental Championships, Zonal Championships and Commonwealth Open Championship will be based on the highest ranked Malaysian in FIDE rating list at that time.
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Meet the Parents
From MCF blog, I got this information:
The Malaysian Chess Federation will hold a MCF – Meet the Parents Forum in conjunction with the National Age-Group Chess Championship 2010 in Penang to clarify certain issues regarding the Selection Guidelines, Ratings , international representation and other matters. The Malaysian Chess Federation cordially invites all parents/ guardians for this forum . Details as below :-
Date : 14th March 2010 (Sunday)
Time : 1700 hours
Venue : Dewan Sri Pinang, Pulau Pinang
Main agenda :
1. MCF Selection Guidelines
2. International representation for juniors. Qualifications
3. National Rating
4. Tournament Rules
5. National Junior Training
6. Sponsorships - Funding
This is a very interesting initiative by the Malaysian Chess Federation. I hope it will lead to more transparency in all MCF matters, something which I have been pushing for.
The Malaysian Chess Federation will hold a MCF – Meet the Parents Forum in conjunction with the National Age-Group Chess Championship 2010 in Penang to clarify certain issues regarding the Selection Guidelines, Ratings , international representation and other matters. The Malaysian Chess Federation cordially invites all parents/ guardians for this forum . Details as below :-
Date : 14th March 2010 (Sunday)
Time : 1700 hours
Venue : Dewan Sri Pinang, Pulau Pinang
Main agenda :
1. MCF Selection Guidelines
2. International representation for juniors. Qualifications
3. National Rating
4. Tournament Rules
5. National Junior Training
6. Sponsorships - Funding
This is a very interesting initiative by the Malaysian Chess Federation. I hope it will lead to more transparency in all MCF matters, something which I have been pushing for.
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
The Eagle has Landed?
The Eagle has Landed is the title of a Jack Higgins book, a fictional war story. A group of German commandos land in World World II England to capture Prime Minister Winston Churchill and bring him back to Germany. I read it when I was a teenager and it was really captivating and written in a vintage Jack Higgins style. It was also made into a successful movie starring the great Michael Caine (think of the butler in The Dark Knight) I recommend both book and movie.
GilaChess uses a similar title to announce the arrival of GM Ziaur Rahman. Ziaur was brought to Malaysia by Dato' Tan Chin Nam. The stated objective is to assist the DAT Chess Centre boost its activities and promote chess learning and teaching.
It cannot be cheap to host a grandmaster here (purported for a whole year). There is his fee, two way air tickets and also board and lodgings to be paid. Also how about the cost for someone to ferry him around?
A day after touchdown at KLIA he was whisked off to Ipoh to compete in the Perak Grand Prix which he won (naturally) with full seven points.
Now I've been scratching my head for the past few days upon reading this news. How does dropping a 2500+ Elo rated grandmaster into a local chess tournament help promote chess? On the contrary it is detrimental as local players are now deprived of a prize (well I presume Ziaur will win the first prize in any local tournament). If the aim is to allow locals a chance, maybe once in a lifetime, to compete against a grandmaster (seven "lucky" players got the opportunity to lose to him), it is better to get him to play simultaneous. This way more can play against him.
I also noticed his name has been entered for the 2010 KL Open. This makes even less sense to me, paying a grandmaster to come and play in a major open in Malaysia. Anybody care to explain the logic here?
GilaChess uses a similar title to announce the arrival of GM Ziaur Rahman. Ziaur was brought to Malaysia by Dato' Tan Chin Nam. The stated objective is to assist the DAT Chess Centre boost its activities and promote chess learning and teaching.
It cannot be cheap to host a grandmaster here (purported for a whole year). There is his fee, two way air tickets and also board and lodgings to be paid. Also how about the cost for someone to ferry him around?
A day after touchdown at KLIA he was whisked off to Ipoh to compete in the Perak Grand Prix which he won (naturally) with full seven points.
Now I've been scratching my head for the past few days upon reading this news. How does dropping a 2500+ Elo rated grandmaster into a local chess tournament help promote chess? On the contrary it is detrimental as local players are now deprived of a prize (well I presume Ziaur will win the first prize in any local tournament). If the aim is to allow locals a chance, maybe once in a lifetime, to compete against a grandmaster (seven "lucky" players got the opportunity to lose to him), it is better to get him to play simultaneous. This way more can play against him.
I also noticed his name has been entered for the 2010 KL Open. This makes even less sense to me, paying a grandmaster to come and play in a major open in Malaysia. Anybody care to explain the logic here?
Labels:
Michael Caine,
The Eagle has Landed,
Ziaur Rahman
Friday, March 5, 2010
What is the future of Malaysian chess? (Final Part)
For too long, our chess has been taking a stroll through the wilderness. It is time we get back onto the highway and it is time for the leadership to show the way. After five parts of analysing the chess scene and MCF, I would like to put forward some suggestions now.
At the DATCC meeting in January, I outlined three fronts that MCF should tackle. They are money, organization and people and goal setting.
Money
Let us face the facts, without money nothing can be done. MCF has always been weak in this area. Don't blame MCF, it is hard to ask for money when you do not have the results to show. Nobody will put money into something that show no returns.
Perhaps MCF should set up a fund and appoint a suitable person to manage it. This person should also be tasked to find ways to generate revenue back into the fund and to stretch it as far as possible. The fund will be used to finance the projects required to achieve the goals set.
The fund will require a willing sponsor to start it with the seed money.
Organization and People
Currently most of the work rests on the shoulders of one or two person. There is a general feeling that these persons control everything. This can be solved by setting sub-committees to be set up to manage the following areas:
Development and Training
Appoint a Chief Coach and two or more Assistant Coaches. They will be responsible for two squads, here I will just call them "A" and "B" team. The coaches will pick suitable candidates for the two squads. The objective of "B" team is to progress into the "A" team. The objective of the "A" team is to progress to replace the current senior players.
Although age is not really a factor, I think that the "B" team will mostly (at least in the first year) consists of junior players aged fourteen and below. Progression will be based on the evaluation of the coaches which will be carried out yearly. Players may be dropped out of the squads if they do not show sufficient improvement. This is to ensure a competitive environment and also that those who do not have the required talent and capabilities make way for fresh blood.
Frankly there is a lot of planning and execution in this area.
Selection
This committee will come up with the criterias and select our players for various events. I think there should be at least three person in this committee to avoid decisions being seen as biased. The decisions should be in writing and published on MCF web-site (if there is one).
Goal Setting
I already talked about this in Part 4 but it is worth repeating. If we do not start setting our goals we will never get out of the wilderness.
Do we want to achieve a first grandmaster? A champion in the World Youth Championships? Introduce chess in schools? Start planning now and put the programs in place to support our chess talents.
Sometimes I think it is very difficult because all three areas require the other two to be ready almost at the same time. If there is money but no proper organization and people in place, nothing will happen. If you have the money and organization but nobody has the vision (goals), nothing will happen either. And finally, you can have thought out the goals you want to achieve,got all the right people together, but without the money it is just a lot of people sharing some dreams.
At the DATCC meeting in January, I outlined three fronts that MCF should tackle. They are money, organization and people and goal setting.
Money
Let us face the facts, without money nothing can be done. MCF has always been weak in this area. Don't blame MCF, it is hard to ask for money when you do not have the results to show. Nobody will put money into something that show no returns.
Perhaps MCF should set up a fund and appoint a suitable person to manage it. This person should also be tasked to find ways to generate revenue back into the fund and to stretch it as far as possible. The fund will be used to finance the projects required to achieve the goals set.
The fund will require a willing sponsor to start it with the seed money.
Organization and People
Currently most of the work rests on the shoulders of one or two person. There is a general feeling that these persons control everything. This can be solved by setting sub-committees to be set up to manage the following areas:
Development and Training
Appoint a Chief Coach and two or more Assistant Coaches. They will be responsible for two squads, here I will just call them "A" and "B" team. The coaches will pick suitable candidates for the two squads. The objective of "B" team is to progress into the "A" team. The objective of the "A" team is to progress to replace the current senior players.
Although age is not really a factor, I think that the "B" team will mostly (at least in the first year) consists of junior players aged fourteen and below. Progression will be based on the evaluation of the coaches which will be carried out yearly. Players may be dropped out of the squads if they do not show sufficient improvement. This is to ensure a competitive environment and also that those who do not have the required talent and capabilities make way for fresh blood.
Frankly there is a lot of planning and execution in this area.
Selection
This committee will come up with the criterias and select our players for various events. I think there should be at least three person in this committee to avoid decisions being seen as biased. The decisions should be in writing and published on MCF web-site (if there is one).
Goal Setting
I already talked about this in Part 4 but it is worth repeating. If we do not start setting our goals we will never get out of the wilderness.
Do we want to achieve a first grandmaster? A champion in the World Youth Championships? Introduce chess in schools? Start planning now and put the programs in place to support our chess talents.
Sometimes I think it is very difficult because all three areas require the other two to be ready almost at the same time. If there is money but no proper organization and people in place, nothing will happen. If you have the money and organization but nobody has the vision (goals), nothing will happen either. And finally, you can have thought out the goals you want to achieve,got all the right people together, but without the money it is just a lot of people sharing some dreams.
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Karpov for FIDE President
A report on Chessvibes that Karpov is seriously considering standing for the FIDE President post. The last time the FIDE Presidency was occupied by a real chess player was when the Icelandic grandmaster Friðrik Ólafsson held the post from 1978 to 1982.
The FIDE elections are due to be held during the General Assembly of the FIDE Congress which will be held during the 39th Olympiad in Khanty-Mansiysk in September 2010. Not everyone can simply stand for president. You have to be nominated by your chess federation. As of writing, the Russian Chess Federation have not yet nominated Karpov.
I believe a person of his stature can garner the necessary support to take on the incumbent, Kirsan Ilyumzhinov who has held the post since 1995. Karpov may be way past his prime as a chessplayer but he is still very much a respected person. When his long time rival, Gary Kasparov was imprisoned for his anti-Putin protests, Karpov surprised everyone by using his political connection to visit Kasparov in prison. Even though I believe it is partly a public relations gimmick, you got to give it to the man. Appearing to side with a government opposition figure, even indirectly, is not something you do in a country such as Russia. Consider the case of Mikhail Khodorkovsky, one of the Russian oligarchs, who at one time was worth billions. He was imprisoned in 2003 on tax fraud but it is commonly acknowledged that the real reason was his financial support of several political parties. While Kasparov was released after five days, Khodorkovsky is still in prison today.
So between Kirsan and Karpov, I'll take Karpov any day.
The FIDE elections are due to be held during the General Assembly of the FIDE Congress which will be held during the 39th Olympiad in Khanty-Mansiysk in September 2010. Not everyone can simply stand for president. You have to be nominated by your chess federation. As of writing, the Russian Chess Federation have not yet nominated Karpov.
I believe a person of his stature can garner the necessary support to take on the incumbent, Kirsan Ilyumzhinov who has held the post since 1995. Karpov may be way past his prime as a chessplayer but he is still very much a respected person. When his long time rival, Gary Kasparov was imprisoned for his anti-Putin protests, Karpov surprised everyone by using his political connection to visit Kasparov in prison. Even though I believe it is partly a public relations gimmick, you got to give it to the man. Appearing to side with a government opposition figure, even indirectly, is not something you do in a country such as Russia. Consider the case of Mikhail Khodorkovsky, one of the Russian oligarchs, who at one time was worth billions. He was imprisoned in 2003 on tax fraud but it is commonly acknowledged that the real reason was his financial support of several political parties. While Kasparov was released after five days, Khodorkovsky is still in prison today.
So between Kirsan and Karpov, I'll take Karpov any day.
Labels:
FIDE President,
Karpov
What is the future of Malaysian chess? (Part 5)
If you have not read the previous posts on this topic, you might might want to read Part 1 ,Part 2 ,Part 3 and Part 4 first.
The MCF council is made up of the President, Deputy President, three Vice-Presidents, Honorary Secretary and Assistant Secretary, Honorary Treasurer and four Committee Members. The council usually meets once a month to discuss pertinent matters, though nowadays I am not sure of the frequency.
The Hon. Secretary does most of the day to day running and leg-work of the MCF affairs. The Secretary have to manage correspondence, arrange council meetings and take minutes and a hundred and one other tasks. The Secretary also have to make a lot of the on-the-spot decisions (hopefully with consultation with the other council members). A good example will be the last minute selection of the last two spots for the 1st Women Masters matches.
In some associations/bodies this is the only full time paid position because of the amount of work required of the secretary. In MCF, the secretary position is given the exalted title of Honorary Secretary, maybe because this is a thankless position and an unpaid one. Nevertheless, this position is the single most important one in the MCF and probably the most powerful.
There is also the issue of conflict of interests. Some council members are chess coaches. For some, it is even the only source of income. Sometimes the member's children are also actively involved in the game. Being in such positions, they are able to exert some influence in their students or children's favour.
I have been around long enough to see many injustice been done to players. A recent example, Lim Yee Weng achieved his final IM norm at the 2008 Malaysian Open and his rating went over 2400. Normally, he should have his title ratified by FIDE at the Dresden Olympiad the same year. But it was not until late 2009 that he was awarded the title by FIDE. Reason being that MCF never submitted an application for him for almost a year. Note: Mok Tze Meng achieved his final norm at the 2009 Malaysian Masters and received the title at the same time as Yee Weng. However, as he later told me, he had to be pro-active and take matters in his own hand. Otherwise he could suffer the same fate as Yee Weng.
If this kind of things happen to our top players, imagine what can happen to our junior players. They are truly at the mercy of organizers and officials. I also used to do chess coaching and over the years I have been told by parents of these kind of abuses.
a) Children of some officials obtained sponsorship to tournaments while they had to pay out of their own pockets.
b) Biased selection
c) Victimization. Read First Gm for confirmation on this.
When I asked these parents why they do not speak up or publicize their experiences, they were reluctant because they were afraid to be branded troublemakers and their children will be subject to further mistreatment. This is also confirmed by First GM in the above link.
It will be detrimental if these our juniors decide to give up on the game due to such reasons.
The MCF council is made up of the President, Deputy President, three Vice-Presidents, Honorary Secretary and Assistant Secretary, Honorary Treasurer and four Committee Members. The council usually meets once a month to discuss pertinent matters, though nowadays I am not sure of the frequency.
The Hon. Secretary does most of the day to day running and leg-work of the MCF affairs. The Secretary have to manage correspondence, arrange council meetings and take minutes and a hundred and one other tasks. The Secretary also have to make a lot of the on-the-spot decisions (hopefully with consultation with the other council members). A good example will be the last minute selection of the last two spots for the 1st Women Masters matches.
In some associations/bodies this is the only full time paid position because of the amount of work required of the secretary. In MCF, the secretary position is given the exalted title of Honorary Secretary, maybe because this is a thankless position and an unpaid one. Nevertheless, this position is the single most important one in the MCF and probably the most powerful.
There is also the issue of conflict of interests. Some council members are chess coaches. For some, it is even the only source of income. Sometimes the member's children are also actively involved in the game. Being in such positions, they are able to exert some influence in their students or children's favour.
I have been around long enough to see many injustice been done to players. A recent example, Lim Yee Weng achieved his final IM norm at the 2008 Malaysian Open and his rating went over 2400. Normally, he should have his title ratified by FIDE at the Dresden Olympiad the same year. But it was not until late 2009 that he was awarded the title by FIDE. Reason being that MCF never submitted an application for him for almost a year. Note: Mok Tze Meng achieved his final norm at the 2009 Malaysian Masters and received the title at the same time as Yee Weng. However, as he later told me, he had to be pro-active and take matters in his own hand. Otherwise he could suffer the same fate as Yee Weng.
If this kind of things happen to our top players, imagine what can happen to our junior players. They are truly at the mercy of organizers and officials. I also used to do chess coaching and over the years I have been told by parents of these kind of abuses.
a) Children of some officials obtained sponsorship to tournaments while they had to pay out of their own pockets.
b) Biased selection
c) Victimization. Read First Gm for confirmation on this.
When I asked these parents why they do not speak up or publicize their experiences, they were reluctant because they were afraid to be branded troublemakers and their children will be subject to further mistreatment. This is also confirmed by First GM in the above link.
It will be detrimental if these our juniors decide to give up on the game due to such reasons.
Monday, March 1, 2010
The Shoutbox Attack
It is not a new opening variation, rather an off the board kind of attack.
When I wrote the post on the Women Masters Selection I had no idea so many others have the same point of view.
It looks like there are many chess lovers who are concerned with the Malaysian chess scene but are unable or do not want to be speak up publicly.
This is proved by the many comments on the shoutbox on this blog as well as other blogs like DATCC. Shoutbox does not require identity verification, the poster can pretty much use any name he/she likes. Unfortunately this allows the unscrupulous to impersonate others.
There are also those who under the shadow of anonymity, takes the opportunity to embark on highly personal attacks directed at MCF Secretary, Gregory Lau. While I disagree with his choice of the participants, I do so in the spirit of positive criticism and I do not condone the way that Greg has been vilified. As of this morning I have removed most comments which I think have no value nor of benefit to chess.
On the positive side, there are some who gave their view of the selection, which I happened to agree with. I will continue to write down these thoughts in Part 5 of the Future of Malaysian Chess series.
When I wrote the post on the Women Masters Selection I had no idea so many others have the same point of view.
It looks like there are many chess lovers who are concerned with the Malaysian chess scene but are unable or do not want to be speak up publicly.
This is proved by the many comments on the shoutbox on this blog as well as other blogs like DATCC. Shoutbox does not require identity verification, the poster can pretty much use any name he/she likes. Unfortunately this allows the unscrupulous to impersonate others.
There are also those who under the shadow of anonymity, takes the opportunity to embark on highly personal attacks directed at MCF Secretary, Gregory Lau. While I disagree with his choice of the participants, I do so in the spirit of positive criticism and I do not condone the way that Greg has been vilified. As of this morning I have removed most comments which I think have no value nor of benefit to chess.
On the positive side, there are some who gave their view of the selection, which I happened to agree with. I will continue to write down these thoughts in Part 5 of the Future of Malaysian Chess series.
Rookie Tornado Results
Rank | SNo. | Name | Rtg | FED | Pts | BH. | BHm. | SB. | Category | Ranking |
1 | 17 | Mohamad Raimi Rahim | 0 | MAL | 6.0 | 31 | 22 | 25.50 | First | |
2 | 15 | Ismail Hassim | 0 | MAL | 5½ | 33½ | 24 | 25.75 | Second | |
3 | 25 | Sunil Kali Vanam | 0 | MAL | 5½ | 25 | 19 | 18.50 | U15 | Third |
4 | 29 | Wu Wen Long | 0 | MAL | 5.0 | 32½ | 23½ | 21.50 | Fourth | |
5 | 2 | Yee Jian Yang | 1384 | MAL | 5.0 | 29½ | 21½ | 20.00 | Fifth | |
6 | 11 | Amir Abdul Hakim | 0 | MAL | 5.0 | 27 | 19½ | 16.50 | ||
7 | 5 | Ethan Wong Hsien Aun | 1320 | MAL | 5.0 | 25 | 19 | 14.50 | U15 | First Under 15 |
8 | 16 | Justin Kumaran | 0 | MAL | 4½ | 31 | 23 | 17.75 | ||
9 | 1 | Syed Remizan Syed Sobri | 1399 | MAL | 4.0 | 28 | 20 | 13.50 | ||
10 | 4 | Hew Zhenjing | 1324 | MAL | 4.0 | 27 | 20 | 12.00 | U15 | Second U 15 |
11 | 6 | Goh Xin Yen | 1310 | MAL | 4.0 | 26½ | 18½ | 12.00 | U15 | Third U 15 |
12 | 14 | Iskandar Rashid | 0 | MAL | 4.0 | 24½ | 18 | 10.50 | ||
13 | 12 | Andrew Yap | 0 | MAL | 4.0 | 23½ | 16½ | 09.50 | ||
14 | 24 | Rohizan Mohd Ali | 0 | MAL | 3½ | 29½ | 21 | 11.75 | ||
15 | 27 | Victoar Imanueol Simon | 0 | MAL | 3½ | 24 | 18 | 10.75 | ||
16 | 8 | Liew Ashton | 1229 | MAL | 3½ | 23½ | 16½ | 08.25 | U15 | |
17 | 7 | Vinton Wong Hsien Loong | 1264 | MAL | 3½ | 21½ | 15 | 07.25 | ||
18 | 18 | Mohd Nasir Kamarol Zaki | 0 | MAL | 3.0 | 26½ | 19½ | 08.00 | ||
19 | 21 | Muhammad Hafiz Hisham | 0 | MAL | 3.0 | 24½ | 17½ | 09.50 | U15 | |
20 | 9 | Evan Loo Hsien Rang | 1215 | MAL | 3.0 | 23½ | 16½ | 07.00 | U11 | First U 11 |
21 | 26 | Tan Wei Ting | 0 | MAL | 3.0 | 20½ | 14 | 05.00 | U11 | Second U 11 |
22 | 22 | Nadia Syafiqah Hisham | 0 | MAL | 3.0 | 18 | 13½ | 05.50 | U11 | Third U 11 |
23 | 3 | Sim Chung Seng | 1366 | MAL | 3.0 | 17½ | 12 | 03.50 | ||
24 | 23 | Nur Sabrina Hisham | 0 | MAL | 2½ | 22 | 16½ | 07.25 | U11 | |
25 | 19 | Muhamad Syazwan Sufian | 0 | MAL | 2.0 | 21 | 16½ | 04.00 | U15 | |
26 | 28 | Vinodh Kumar Kuru | 0 | MAL | 2.0 | 21 | 14½ | 04.00 | U15 | |
27 | 10 | Abdul Hakim Nordin | 0 | MAL | 1½ | 18½ | 13 | 04.25 | ||
28 | 13 | Cobein Kumar Kuru | 0 | MAL | 1½ | 16½ | 12½ | 01.25 | U15 | |
29 | 20 | Muhammad Alinur Abu Bakar | 0 | MAL | 1.0 | 22½ | 15½ | 03.50 | U15 |
Labels:
Rookie Tornado
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)