The Candidates Matches are played over four standard games. Then tie-breaks of four rapid games. If by then a winner has not been decided, blitz games (up to five games) will be played with the first player to win going through. If it is still tied after five games then a final Armaggedon game with five minutes for one side and four for the other. The player with four minutes gets draw odds. The winner of this Candidates gets to face World Champion Anand for the title in 2012.
If anyone were to predict that Topalov, Aronian and Kramnik will not feature in the final, everyone will think him crazy. Surprise. Kamsky eliminated Topalov and Grischuk took out Aronian. The semis featured Gelfand-Kamsky and Kramnik-Grischuk. All standard time control games were drawn. The tie-breaks were played last night.
Kramnik - Grischuk
Grischuk is also a poker player (according to sources, a professional one at that) and he came up with a strategy just like the card game where one bets everything on the last card. In chess terms, draw all the standard and rapid games and stake everything on the blitz. In the rapids, as white , Grischuk offered draws in fourteen moves and another game in just eight moves. Kramnik obliged, after all he has white in the next games right? Still, he could not win a single game with White either and the match went to blitz tie-breaks.
In the first game, Grischuk out-played Kramnik and won a pawn and the game. In the second, it was again Grischuk who had all the winning chances. He took no risks and steered the game into a drawn rook ending and thus qualified for the final.
Gelfand - Kamsky
It was quite excruciating to watch Gelfand and Kamsky. Both players could not be faulted for not trying , just that the quality of the games were not really satisfying. Especially Gelfand was missing a lot of stuff.
Kamsky-Gelfand, Rapid Game 2 |
Gelfand-Kamsky, Rapid Game 3 |
Despite all these oversights, Gelfand still beat Kamsky in the blitz and gets to meet Grischuk in the final.
I really hope Gelfand does not win the finals because this kind of chess will be very embarrassing for him in a title match with Anand.
2 comments:
Hi Jimmy
1. The match may be boring, but your reporting and your view seem interesting.
2. Looks like both bridge and poker will produce good chess masters.
rgds
seng
or good chess players make good bridge/poker players
Post a Comment