Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Thoughts on "glass ceiling"

This term can be used in many areas but usually it is used in the context of the workplace. It refers to an invisible barrier  through which a minority (usually women) can see (hence "glass") elite positions but cannot reach them ("ceiling").

In our context of chess in Malaysia, someone used it to imply that our juniors have been unfairly prevented from  reaching the top levels and representing the country in major tournaments. Further implication is that the elite group (the IMs) are colluding amongst themselves to "keep" their positions, by "fixing" their games and agreeing draws while going all out against the juniors. How true is this?



Let us examine  the recent SEA Games selection. This is perfect example because there are exactly five seniors and five juniors competing.

Rank Title  Name Rtg1 23 45 67 89 10Pts
1IM Mas Hafizulhelmi  2418 *½1½1 1½½117
2IM  Lim Yee-Weng  2248 ½ *½ ½½ ½½ 11 16
3IM  Liew Chee-Meng-Jimmy 2302  0½*1½½½1 116
4  Subramaniam Sumant  2065  ½  ½ 0  * ½  0 1  1 1  1 5½
5  Wahiduddin Kamalarifin 2169  0½½½*101 11
6  Lim Zhuo Ren  2080  0  ½ ½  1 0  * ½  0 1  1 4½
7IM Mok Tze-Meng  2394 ½½½01 ½*0½½4
8  Fong Yit San  1945  ½  0 0  0 0  1 1  * ½  ½ 3½
9 Tan Jun Feng  1849 00000 0½½*½
10  Fong Yit Ho  1995  0  0 0  0 0  0 ½  ½ ½  * 1½

The seniors played 20 games amongst themselves and 25 games against juniors.

  Total  Decisive Draws  Win % draw %
 Junior v. Junior 20   8  12  40  60 
 Junior v. Senior 25   16  9  64  36 
 Seniors v. Seniors 20   6  14  30  70 
 Seniors v. Juniors 25   16  9  64  36 

Comparing draws between juniors we see there is 60% draws whereas amongst the seniors it is 70%. This is not a significant difference.

What it means is that the juniors were just as likely to draw with each other just like seniors would draw with themselves. So the argument that seniors draw amongst themselves to keep their position is not true because the juniors do the same thing.

You will see the difference between qualifying and not qualifying is how many games they won from each other. Look at Sumant's score against the juniors. Sumant won three games and lost one to the other four juniors. He qualified.

If you want to talk about a glass ceiling, it is actually constructed by the juniors themselves. So next time do some research and check your facts before putting pen on paper.

Incidentally, this tournament put paid to the "senior versus junior" argument. Only one junior managed to take a place from the seniors. Now you see why someone no longer talking about "senior versus junior".

0 comments:

Post a Comment