Showing posts with label chess improvement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label chess improvement. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Opening Repertoire Planning

The late Soviet grandmaster David Bronstein once spent half an hour on his second move. After 1. b3 e5 2. Bb2 he thought more than half an hour before playing 2...Nc6. That does not mean that he did not know the opening, he has his reasons for taking so much time (the reasons are not relevant to this article ... maybe a future post).

If you do not want to spend half an hour on your second move then having a opening repertoire is a must. An opening repertoire is an essential tool for all aspiring chess player. Unless you have no ambition except to play the occasional week-end rapid, you will need one. Once you have a proper repertoire in place, you will feel much more confident when you sit down at the board in competitive play. The following is a method I use - it may or may not work for you.

The first step to building a repertoire does not even require a chess board. Get a few sheets of loose leaf blank paper and a pencil. If you have a computer than just fire up your favourite word processor or Windows Notepad.

Now enter the following headings, leaving plenty of space between each heading:

  • Black Repertoire
    • Black against 1. d4
    • Black against 1. e4
    • Black against Others


  • White Repertoire
    •  Open with 1. e4
    • Open with 1. d4

  • White must win opening
  • Black must win opening

Write down what your opening will be against queen pawn under that "Black against 1. d4". Then write down all the variations that you think are likely to encounter. For example if you play the King's Indian Defence as black it will look something like this.

Black against 1. d4
  • King's Indian
    • Saemsich
    • Averbakh
    • Main Line
    • .......

  • Black against Others

    • Reti Opening

    • English Opening


Do the same for each heading. The "must win" heading is the opening that you will use in situations where you need to win, usually in the last round or against your main rival. For example if you defend the Ruy Lopez with the Breyer variation, your "must win" variation could be the Marshall Gambit (or could still be the Breyer).

Once you have planned out your complete repertoire it is your guide and you can start searching for key games for each line or variation. I am not going to go into detail on this part as it needs another article to do justice. Important note - do not put any actual games into this document just a reference to the players and the tournament will do. You do not want too much clutter here. Key games should be stored in a database such as Chessbase or SCID (google it).

Review what you have written and make sure you are comfortable with it. Building a repertoire is not something that can be done quickly and there are no shortcuts. It will take you anywhere from half to one year just to build a basic repertoire. As you play more and more, you will find that you may drop some lines in favour of others or add more lines to your repertoire. A repertoire is  always a work in progress, review it before playing any major tournaments.

Before a game, I will go through this document and decide what opening and variation is likely to be played. Then go through all the associated key games. You will be surprised how much more confident you feel at the board, especially if your opponent plays into your prepared line!

This method has worked for me and hopefully you will gain benefit from it as well.

Friday, February 11, 2011

Why do we lose..continued

In the last post, I asked the question why from the starting position I reached the lost position in Diagram 2.


The answer is that along the way  Black made a mistake or a number of mistakes.

Your opponent cannot force a win on you. You have to lose the game. Think about it.

Nobody can beat you, not even the greatest chess genius, if you do not make any errors.

Games are lost not won. Think about the previous sentence again until you really get it.This is a great truth.

Of course, it is easier said then done (not making errors), we are human after all.

Watch this video by Kasparov on why we lose.



After each game, what if you go back and find all those mistakes you made. Now you know you should not make such a move in such a position and next time hopefully you will not. That is how you improve. That is why you must always analyze all your games, not just won ones.

Once you have confidence in your ability to not make mistakes, your results will improve.

Why do we lose?

Why do we lose a chess game?

Consider the position in the diagram below. This is an all too familiar position to us all.




Let's say after x number of moves , we reach the following position ( a random position I picked out)


Black is mated.

From the original position to being mated, how could  such thing happen? What happened in between the two diagrams? Think about it and I'll continue in the next post.

Sunday, January 2, 2011

Improve your chess

How does one train to improve our chess? Thirty years ago, knowledge was scarce and chess books hard to come by and anyway I could not afford them. I had to make up my own training methods.

Many years ago I used to keep a journal of all my tournament games. This was way before the appearance of chess databases like ChessBase. I meticulously wrote down by hand my thoughts and analysis over the board, which I then combined with post game analysis. This method helped me to improve my calculation abilities. Later I read Kotov's book "Think Like a Grandmaster" where he also suggests the same method.

I still have some seven or eight notebooks of my games and analysis with games dating from 1975 to 1990. Browsing through these notebooks can bring back a lot of memories.
Below is one such game with my notes written right after the tournament. Guy West is a fierce competitor who plays every game to win. He later attained the IM title and disappeared from the chess scene in favour of a more stable profession. Lately he is making a comeback, winning the 2009 Melbourne Chess Club championship by a point.

Future Indonesian top grandmaster Utut Adianto appeared for the first time in this tournament. We drew an interesting ending. Incidently, this was the tournament where I met my wife but that is another story :).

[Event "Laoag City Zonal"]
[Site "Laoag City Zonal"]
[Date "1985.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "West, Guy"]
[Black "Liew, J."]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C11"]

1.e4 e6 2.Nf3 d5 3.Nc3

This is a pet variation of the Australian master. If black now pushes 3...d4 white can start pressuring the d4 pawn after 4 Ne2 c5 5 c3

3...Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.d4 c5 6.dxc5 Nc6 7.Bf4

White has transposed to a position more commonly reached via the
move order: 1 e4 e6 2 d4 d5 3 Nc3 Nf6 4 e5 Nfd7 5 Nf3 c5 6 dxc5 Bxc5
7 Bd3. White is aiming for rapid king-side development and he is
willing to relinquish his centre for this.

7...Bxc5 8.Bd3 f6 9.exf6 Qxf6 10.Bg5 Qf7 11.Bh4

Temporarily preventing black from castling (11...0-0?? 12
Bxh7 +-). However the move has the drawback of handing over the e5
square to black. Neither is 11 Qe2 satisfactory as black has the
advantage after 11... Nd4 12 Nxd4 Bxd4

11...Nde5 12.Nxe5 Nxe5 13.Be2 O-O 14.O-O Bd7 15.Bg3 Ng6 16.Bd3

White could have made things more difficult for black with the move 16 Bh5 pinning the knight and threatening 17 Bxg6 Qxg6 18 Nxd5 winning a pawn

16...Nf4 17.Qd2 Bc6 18.Rae1 Rae8 19.a3 a6 20.b4 Bb6 21.a4 Bd7 22.a5 Bc7 23.Ne2 Nxd3 24.cxd3 e5 25.d4 Bb5 26.dxe5 Bxe5 27.Bxe5 Rxe5 28.Nd4

White has cleverly emerged with a good knight versus bad bishop ending. Black has to defend very carefully.

28...Rxe1 29.Rxe1 Re8 30.Rxe8+


White declines to double black's queen-side pawns with 30 Nxb5. Perhaps he
figured his chances were better if he kept the knight

30...Qxe8 31.f3 Bc4 32.Kf2 h6 33.Qe3



Qa4


Black must avoid at all cost a queen exchange as any N v B ending would be hopeless for him

34.Qe1

Not 34 Qe7 Qd1 35 Ne6 Qe2 36 Kg3 Qe5 37 Kg4 Bd3 when the white king is in
trouble

34...Qa2+ 35.Kg3 Qb2

Now white cannot defend both d4 and b4 so he is forced into an offensive against the black king

36.Qe8+ Kh7 37.Nf5 Qxb4 38.Ne7 d4 39.Qg6+ Kh8 40.Qe8+ Kh7 41.Qg6+ Kh8 42.Nf5


Declining a draw by perpetual check. However the exchange of pawns has freed the black bishop and black's chances in this position is as good as white's if not better

42...Qf8 43.Nxd4 Qb8+ 44.f4 Qd8 45.Nf5 Qd3+ 46.Kh4 Qd8+ 47.Kh3 Qd7 48.g4 Bd3 49.Qd6 Bxf5 50.Qf8+ Kh7

It appears that 51 Qxf5 would lose to 51. .Qxf5 52 gxf5 Kg8 53 Kg4 Kf7
54 Kf3 Ke7 55 Ke4 Kd6 since black can create an outside passed pawn,
but White missed an excellent opportunity to force a draw here, 54 Kh5! Kf6 55 h4 Kxf5 draws by stalemate




51.gxf5 Qd3+ 52.Kh4 Qd2 53.Kg3 Qxa5 54.Qf7 Qc3+ 55.Kg4 Qc6 56.f6 Qg2+ 57.Kf5 Qc2+ 58.Ke5

Or 58 Kg4 Qg6+ forces the exchange of queens

58...Qc3+ 59.Ke6 Qxf6+ 60.Qxf6 gxf6 61.Kxf6 b5 62.f5 b4 63.Ke6 b3 64.f6 b2 65.f7 b1=Q 66.f8=Q Qg6+



If black had queened the a-pawn instead this check would not be available and the endinq is most likely drawn. Now whatever square the white king goes, black can exchange queens for a winning pawn ending

67.Kd5

This is the best chance, forcing the black king further away and moving to capture the a-pawn. Still it fails by a single move.

Qg8+ 68.Qxg8+ Kxg8 69.Kc5 Kf7 70.Kb6 Kf6 71.Kxa6 Kf5 72.Kb5 Kg4 73.Kc4 Kh3 74.Kd3 Kxh2 75.Ke2 Kg2 0-1